Interesting conflict of interests here. Do you go for the best score in terms of badges to help your team avoid having anyone eliminated, or do you go for a worse score with (fewer pieces/faster solve) to avoid being the one on your team who is eliminated.

lord_hamybal wrote:http://www.fantasticcontraption.com/?designId=11310404 in 20 secs

Did you do that from mine? I thought that the third wheel should be able to give it a little boost, but I didn't think about moving the small goal square, so I never got that last tick out of it.

Paleo8 wrote:Congrats degaston!!!

Thanks, first comp I've won. (though I've only done a couple of them before this)

Thanks for hosting, Wafflekins.

I guess I'm done. Can't seem to find anything better.

Bisam wrote:You shouldn't have said that....

It's been said many times around here, so what's the problem? If someone does better I guess they deserve it. I'm done messing around with it.

Paleo8 wrote:

0wnyouu wrote:have a great solve for round 5

I feel lucky

Triple digits = shaky ground

Congratulations Cruiser! Good comp guys!

I submitted this morning. My message hasn't been read yet.

I was just planning to use my immunity for this round and wait for round 7... if there is one.

S.K.J wrote:How do you get .5 of point?

A green solution lets you subtract 10 points or 1/2 your score, whichever is greater, so if you have an odd number of sticks and 21 points or more you end up with a .5 at the end of your score.

I see I miscalculated my score for down below - it should be -30

Immunity is nice, but where are my awesome points?

Nevermind - I see I gave the wrong ID's in my last submission. Dang - missed out on all that internet glory!

jonnychoob wrote:...quickly added degaston's update to the results before posting them...

I don't know if I missed the cutoff or made a mistake in my submission, but my last update should have brought my score to -64 and one tick faster than xhawkx.

In

Time's up... Did anyone beat -47?

Strange... I also get 673, 678 and 681 on repeated runs. Is this a bug?